BuzzFeed goes deep into the story

A Dutch Teenager’s story with "Legal Euthanasia"

A Dutch Teenager's story with "Legal Euthanasia"
A Dutch Teenager's Death Was Wrongly Reported As "Legal Euthanasia" Across International Media. Here's How They All Got It Wrong. Source : BuzzFeed

Inaccurate stories claiming the 17-year-old had been “legally euthanised” travelled so widely across the internet that even the Pope appeared to tweet about it.

Shortly after lunchtime on Tuesday, one of the world’s biggest English-language news outlets, Mail Online, published a story about the death of a Dutch teenager named Noa Pothoven.

Deploying one of the news outlet’s trademark long, outrage-inducing headlines, the website claimed: “Dutch girl, 17, who was sexually abused at 11 and raped as a 14-year-old is legally euthanised at her home by ‘end -of-life’ clinic because she felt her life was unbearable due to depression.”

The story about Pothoven being “legally euthanised”, complete with Instagram tributes from the 17-year-old’s sister, soon spread across other English-speaking news online outlets.

In less than 24 hours, versions of the story were written by the Sun, the Daily Star, the Independent, UNILAD, Sky News, The Times, the Italian press, the Australian News Corp-owned News.com.au, the New York Post, the Daily Beast, NBC-part owned Euronews, and the Washington Post.

They weren’t just referencing Mail Online’s story. Some didn’t attribute the information to anywhere.

Even the BBC’s World Service did a segment about Pothoven’s “euthanasia”, with a correspondent giving an important caveat mid-way through the interview: “I should make it clear, we’re not entirely certain about how (she) actually died.”
It didn’t matter, because the story about the Dutch teen who had been “legally euthanized” clocked hundreds of thousands of shares on Facebook and countless retweets on Twitter, becoming the biggest story in the world. According to the Mail Online’s display, the story had been shared a staggering 124,000 times.
By Wednesday, the story was front page news in Italy and was so dominating the internet conversation that the Pope appeared to weigh-in with a sub-tweet.

“Euthanasia and assisted suicide are a defeat for all,” @Pontifex wrote on Twitter.“We are called never to abandon those who are suffering, never giving up but caring and loving to restore hope.”

But amidst all the online outrage and all the page views, it appears all the media outlets who ran the story missed a key fact.

On Wednesday, thanks to the diligence of Politico Europe reporter Naomi O’Leary, the truth finally started to emerge outside of the Netherlands: Noa Pothoven had not been “legally euthanised” at all.

She had requested euthanasia under Dutch law but had been refused. She died at home after refusing to eat and her parents and doctors agreed not to force feed her, offering her palliative care instead.

After O’Leary used her Twitter feed to lay out the facts of the story and call out the outlets who had unquestioningly gone with the false version, those outlets quickly began changing headlines, rewriting copy and deleting sentences.

Some added notes at the end of the story explaining how it had been corrected. Others did not.

So how did the inaccurate version of the story get into the internet’s bloodstream and travel so widely? According to several sources, the Mail Online foreign news desk had taken the story about Pothoven’s death from a small British news agency called Central European News (CEN).

Owned by businessman Michael Leidig, CEN sells stories and photos from around the world to some of the biggest English-speaking outlets in the news business.
A 2015 BuzzFeed News investigation into CEN and Leidig titled “The King of Bullshit News”, raised questions about the reliability of the information being sold by the company.

Earlier this year, a district court judge in New York dismissed a libel case brought against BuzzFeed News by Leidig and CEN over the publication of the story.
Both Leidig and CEN are appealing the decision.

BuzzFeed News has sent a series of questions to Leidig about how the news agency had come to distribute a distorted story about Pothoven’s death. At the time of publication, Leidig had not responded.

Despite the media’s misrepresentation of her death, Noa Pothoven remains a tragic one. Pothoven was 17 when she died in her home on Sunday, refusing fluids and food since the beginning of June. According to local Dutch media, her parents and doctor agreed to not force feed her.

Last year it was reported by that Pothoven applied for euthanasia or assisted suicide at an “end of life” clinic in The Hague but her request was rejected.
A spokesperson for the clinic told DutchNews that they could not confirm or deny that she was actually a patient: “There are very few young adults in euthanasia clinics, and it’s even rarer to see them for psychiatric reasons. Euthanasia of someone who is 60 is very different to that of someone who is 16. But we follow the law, which says someone must be in unbearable suffering with no other alternative.”

In a statement published to their website, the end of life clinic say they’ve been inundated with requests for comment following the death of Pothoven and said that due to privacy rules they can’t make any statement about this.

They wrote: “To put an end to incorrect reporting (in foreign media in particular) about her death, we refer to the statement made by friends of Noa this afternoon: Noa Pothoven did not die of euthanasia.

“To stop her suffering, she has stopped eating and drinking. De Levenseindekliniek deals exclusively with euthanasia and does so explicitly within the Dutch legal framework.”
The law in the Netherlands for euthanasia is careful with very strict guidelines and the penalty for unlawful euthanasia can lead to 12 years imprisonment. The number of cases of death by euthanasia fell 9% last year. However, “end of life” clinics have been getting more requests from people under 30.
The Royal Dutch Medical Association (RDMA) have released a statement saying that the international media have misrepresented the death of Pothoven.
The wrote: “The RDMA feels the urge to correct the misreporting, because it gives a wrong impression of Dutch law and practice.
“Under Dutch law, euthanasia is defined as the active termination of life, by a physician, at a patient’s voluntary and well-informed request. Euthanasia can be performed under strict conditions on persons who suffer unbearably and hopeless from a medical condition.”
"Euthanasia can be performed under strict conditions on persons who suffer unbearably and hopeless from a medical condition."

Pothoven wrote an autobiography titled “Winnen of Leren” (win or learn) that originally started off as a diary. In the book she detailed what happened when she was sexually assaulted multiple times starting at 11 years old and later raped at 14. She also spoke of her struggles with PTSD, anorexia, depression and the way the country provides support for young people.

In December 2018 she spoke to de Gelderlander about not wanting to live any longer. She said: “They think I’m too young to die. They think I should complete the trauma treatment and that my brain must first be fully grown. That lasts until you are 21. I’m devastated because I can’t wait that long anymore.”

She told VICE NL just three months ago about how she hopes her book will reform how young people in mental health crises’ are treated.
She said: “Through my book new questions will be asked over how youth care is organised.

“Soon I am going to be speaking to a juvenile judge who has read my book, if you are at risk of being admitted [into isolation] the juvenile court decides that.

“As a young person you will then also have a lawyer, who will speak in your best interests. The sitting in a courtroom has made a huge effect on me. I sat there like I was a criminal, though I’ve never stolen a sweet. As far as I’m concerned, depressed young people shouldn’t go to court.”

On Sunday, Pothoven passed away in her living room and she wrote a final post on Instagram where she said “Love is letting go”.

Politico’s Naomi O’Leary, the journalist who posted the viral Twitter thread calling out the coverage, told BuzzFeed News she was initially shocked to read the English-language coverage of Pothoven’s death.
“I was seeing how enormous it was, and like thinking, ’where does it say this is euthanasia, where is this reporting coming from?’ None of the Dutch language news reports say euthanasia.’” she said. “If it was euthanasia it would be the massive story in the Netherlands.”

O’Leary said the story about a raped teen being “legally euthanized” was helped along by negative perceptions of the Netherlands and a “bad stereotype” of a liberal country where “anything goes”.
“The stereotypes that the world has of the Netherlands as being this wildly liberal place, where anything can happen,” she said. “This stereotype helped people jump to the conclusion that this is what had happen.
“It spread like wildfire because it feeds into the euthanasia debate.
“It’s such a shocking story, it’s shocking anyway, it makes people pause and say, ‘do we really want that to be legal?’”
In the wake of the thread, mainstream media outlets that had misreported the death quickly starting making significant changes to their stories.
The Mail Online changed words and sentences, including a subtle headline change, removing “legally euthanized” to “legally allowed”. The Independent, New York Post, Washington Post and Daily Beast made changes with small clarifications appended to their stories. The Washington Post deleted a tweet which claimed she was “euthanized”.
UNILAD, one of Britain’s top publishers of videos and news content to Facebook, posted a detailed correction, including outlining the original errors, at the top of its story: “This article was originally published containing false or misleading information. It was originally reported Noa Pothoven, a 17-year-old woman from the Netherlands had died by euthanasia. This is not true. A mistranslation from the original Dutch story led to an assumption of euthanasia.”

Euronews, part-owned by NBC, launched an internal inquiry. In a statement to BuzzFeed News, a Euronews spokesperson said its story was published without fact-checking, and was going off the reporting of other news outlets.
"The story was removed from our website on Wednesday morning, as soon as we became aware of concerns about the reliability of the information," the spokesperson said.
"It became clear subsequently that Euronews’ reporting guidelines had not been followed in this instance (the piece was picked up from another media outlet without further checks, which is against our reporting guidelines) and the article has been corrected as we work to verify the circumstances around Noa Pothoven’s death.

"A full inquiry is being made into exactly why the reporting guidelines were not followed and appropriate action will be taken to prevent this from happening again.”
Following all this international coverage of the story, members of the media have been contacting the family, who have said through a Dutch outlet that they will not be having any interviews. Noa’s father told the AD that the family wants radio silence following her story going viral.
He told the paper: "We are in completely mourning Noa and we can’t do that in the media and we don’t want to have this hassle. We want nothing to do with this. We want to rest."

Pothoven’s mother said she hopes her daughters book becomes compulsory for social workers, but also for child judges and municipalities, who are responsible for youth care.

Pothoven’s personal Instagram page appears to have been deleted.

Source : BuzzFeed

Have we not taken note ? What went unseen ? السابق

Have we not taken note ? What went unseen ?

خرق السرية يعاقب عليه القانون التالي

خرق السرية يعاقب عليه القانون

شاركنا تعليقك